Jump to content

Talk:Arrow (missile family)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleArrow (missile family) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 27, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
October 9, 2009Good article nomineeListed
November 11, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
December 5, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Arrow (missile)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Current ref #22 is to another Wikipedia page, which is not considered a reliable ref, especially when discussing "controversial performance" issues.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This article looks really nice, but there are a couple of small issues that need to be addressed. Once these are taken care of, the article should be good to go for GA status. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 23:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you much, I've been waiting quite long for a GA Review! I'll change this ref #22 tomorrow. Flayer (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed! Flayer (talk) 08:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass this article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

missing references to MDA

[edit]

This page lacks any reference to the U.S. Missile Defense Agency's role in the program (MDA oversees the U.S. funding for Arrow as part of its broader missile defense portfolio). This is a major oversight and should be corrected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.34 (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Flayer (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

100 people personnel

[edit]

The article mentions it requires a crew of 100 people to operate the system. Even including all technical staff, this figure is about 4 or 5 times too big. 93.173.147.221 (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any reference? Here is the source of the 100 soldiers personnel: [1]. Flayer (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Arrow (missile) → Arrow (Israeli missile) – There's also Arrow (Russian missile), about a Soviet missile, which would be familiar under its NATO reporting name, so as this missile requires disambiguation it should have enough precision to determine which subject it is about. The name "Arrow (missile)" would redirect to the main disambiguation page Arrow (disambiguation) 65.92.181.190 (talk) 14:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:

Technically, the arrow (of bows and arrows) is also a type of missile, since archers are a type of missile troops in classical and medieval armies. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 03:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/projects/arrow2/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.army-technology.com/mediapacks/Sites/27/
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two numberings of footnotes

[edit]

I do not understand why their numbering restarts at the second column.

— 200.219.132.103 (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know it is too early and people will probably not even have read the message above, but would it be OK to convert footnotes to, say, {{Efn}} and {{Notelist}} templates, perhaps with {{Notelist |64em}} to keep two columns in wide enough displays?
— 200.219.132.105 (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reason the numbering restarted is that there was a group=x and a group=y each group had different numberings. I changed all the footnotes to group="Note" so they are numbered 1 to 5. I don't see a need to redo everything with efn and notelist for the purpose of column widths, but that's just me. Everyone has a different screen width and font size so how it looks on your screen is not the same as everyone else. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely my point, 64em makes for adjustment. Granted Notelist is not needed for that. On the other hand, I find it more pleasing if footnotes are denoted by simple letters instead of ‘x #’, and that in the references section they are not numbered the same as citations. But that is just me, too? We could just change group = "Note" to group = lower-alpha and it would be done.
— 200.219.133.150 (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Arrow (Israeli missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrow (Israeli missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Arrow (Israeli missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Arrow (Israeli missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arrow (Israeli missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Arrow (Israeli missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflation of Arrow (1) and Arrow missile family

[edit]

I have moved the page from Arrow (Israeli missile) to Arrow (Israeli missile family). Arrow (later Arrow 1) was more of a technology demonstrator. However, this article needs some revisions to get rid of this conflation: for example, Arrow doesn't have fixed specifications because it is not an individual missile. This section should be replaced. Zagreus99 (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Arrow_(missile_family)&oldid=1217987021"