Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys chase girls
Appearance
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 18:13, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Seems like either vanity (Josh Jackson), silly nonsense, or an article of dubious truth. Therefore, delete. Bratsche 21:17, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Vanity? Silly nonsense? Dubious truth? All of the above. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:21, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete It is a mass array of silly nonsense. B.S. 21:26, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Lovely nonsense, but nonsense. --EnSamulili 22:29, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. While the creator obviously had some creative ideas on his mind, such nonsense and lack of resource to back up any "facts" present does not belong in Wikipedia.CryptoStorm 22:31, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Unencyclopedic nonsense. -- The Anome 22:58, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete -- Longhair 23:25, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. We'll chase the boys and girls away. Miss Pippa 00:01, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Bless. Jdcooper 23:15, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Although I am tempted to suggest a redirect to Gender role. --L33tminion | (talk) 15:46, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.