Talk:City News Bureau of Chicago

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Untitled

I worked at the City News Bureau from 1962 through 1964 as a police reporter, rewrite man, and City Hall correspondent, where I dealt with Richard J. Daley (the real Mayor Daley), every day. I graduated from there to work for Chicago's American, "Chicago's fourth leading daily". There were only five. Ortolan88

My first job out of college, $60 a week. Damn, it was fun! Ortolan88 04:41 Nov 2, 2002 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on City News Bureau of Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving City Bureau section

It's not clear to me that there is any relationship between the older City New Bureau of Chicago and the 2015 organization City Bureau. There currently is a small section on the latter in this article. I created a full article for this organization here: City Bureau. Any objections to me removing the City Bureau section here and just including a Distinguish template? @Alanscottwalker: as the person who I think added the content. --Bairdwarp (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Done, though I decided to go with the about template instead to provide more context. --Bairdwarp (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]