Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miktiano

Miktiano was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

Not notable constructed language - only gets one Google hit, its own home page, which does not explain who developed the language, why it was developed or who speaks it. --ZeroOne 21:01, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Delete. Article makes no argument as to this language's notability. Rick K 21:03, Sep 26, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Non-notable auxlang attempt. Your basic euroclone. I've never heard of it, and I follow these things. — Gwalla | Talk 21:51, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Delete Agree with comments above Jongarrettuk 00:51, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete conlang vanity. -- Cyrius|✎ 22:56, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. I consider myself well-informed on the topic of conlangs, and I've never heard of it. Wiwaxia 03:04, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.