Talk:Canadarm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canadarm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Robotics Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada C‑class Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

How much electrical power could it draw

What voltages and currents might it need to operate ? STS - PAYLOAD DEPLOYMENT AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM says it uses the main 28 V DC bus and one of the AC buses (115 V 400 Hz) AC1 or AC2. Up to 520 W (28 V DC) for heaters, but how much for lights, cameras and motors ? Orbiter could supply 12 kW peak. - Rod57 (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Provision for jettisoning the arm if it could not be restowed

"If the manipulator arm cannot be restowed for any reason, it will be jettisoned so the payload bay doors can be closed. There are four separation points: one at the shoulder and one at each of the three retention latches. Each separation point is individually released." STS - PAYLOAD DEPLOYMENT AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM Pyro devices would guillotine cable bundles and presumably the arms or joints as well. Would be nice to find/use a published doc as ref. - Rod57 (talk) 12:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

British vs. American vs. Canadian English

The article use {{Use British English}}, the talk page use {{Canadian English}}, and the subject has national WP:TIES to the US, where American English is de facto national. Should this article use British or American or Canadian English? --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced {{Canadian English}} with {{British English}} in this talk page, as British English will be de facto used in the article until the consensus is reached. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging the users that have done significant contributions on the article. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While I am not one to be rah-rah for American spelling, I do think this article should be written in American English. It's service during the shuttle era was on an American spacecraft, and the current iteration on the ISS was an American installation. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The one thing that I think most can agree on, I'd think, is that it shouldn't be in British English. I'd assume that Canadian English would make the most sense. The references are mostly Canadian. It's got a Canadian flag on it. It's got Canada in the name. The arm itself is pictured in all sorts of Canadian iconography like stamps and on the $5 bill. (UTC) File:Canadian $5 note specimen - back.jpg Nfitz (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2020

On giving it some more thought, I think it should be in Canadian English instead of American English. I can see the merits of both, but it is a purely-Canadian technology that was used by the US. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 08:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The current consensus is against the British English in favour of Canadian English. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

a crad

it a big arm that looks like a crad 24.51.244.217 (talk) 19:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]