User talk:Carlosar~enwiki

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you feel like it, you may leave a note at the new user log too.

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

Dori | Talk 14:23, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)

Hi - you need to give your images better names - as ones with the same name overwrite each other. symbol.png and flag.png are not suitable. You also need to say where your images come from. Thanks. Secretlondon 20:06, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Carlosar:
Great job you're doing with Americana! Is that where you live? It sounds like an interesting place.
Unfortunately, what we can't allow is for you cut-and-paste copyrighted information from other websites (such as guiaamericana.com.br) without knowing whether or not they've given you permission. Do you work for the municipality or the website? Perhaps if you ask politely, they would give permission.
If they don't, we'll probably have to remove your work from the Wikipedia to avoid possible copyright problems. No one wants that to happen, of course, but we do have to be careful about copyrights.
Saludinhos, –Hajor 17:31, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Pedro II of Brazil-images

Hi,

have a look at Image:Dompedro-II.jpg, Image:Dpedro2.png, Image:Dompedro-grant.jpg and Image:Dom-pedro-ii-family-b.jpg next time you look by ... Interpretix 18:09, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:Dpedro1.png

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 05:16, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Re: Could you please help me?

You are correct, I am a native English speaker. The article itself appears to be written in good English, didn't notice any grammatical or spelling mistakes reading it. I would say that it appears to require some input from a counter-MST POV. If, as it says on the discussion page, MST has links to FARC, Hugo Chavez, etc, this is extremely troubling. I'd have to know how the current owners, who are being expropriated, acquired the property in the first place. Depending on whether it was acquired through legitimate or illegimate means, MST may or may not be correct in expropriating the land. I'm alarmed by the fact that according to the Index of Economic Freedom 2004, Brazil is classified as a "mostly unfree" economy [1]. So in closing, the article itself is well-written from a proper English point of view, but I'm very leery of MST personally, and believe that criticism of MST would be justified in the article. --MSTCrow June 29, 2005 04:01 (UTC)

Image:Brazil-flag-12.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brazil-flag-12.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Zscout370 (Sound Off) 4 July 2005 22:15 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brazil-stars-flag.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brazil-stars-flag.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 18:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Zscout370 (Sound Off) 4 July 2005 22:18 (UTC)[reply]

Alterações nas páginas

Caro Carlos.

Eu desfiz suas alterações nas páginas do PT. O texto que você escreveu é muito estreito: o PT nunca se pôs como partido Comunista (se fosse um, se teria comunista no nome). O partido foi fundado sem asceticismo teórico. Apenas um partido de esquerda. Existe claro, todas essas correntes internas que seguem os ismos todos. Mas assim como há os leninistas há os sociais-democratas (não no sentido PSDB da palavra, bem entendido). A referência a respeito da NEP é completamente absurda. O Brasil não é um país agrário que está passando por uma industrialização rápida orientada pelo Estado!

Quanto às alterações na orientação política dos partidos brasileiros...

PPS é discutível rotular como centro-esquerda ou esquerda...
PSDB é impossível chamar de centro-esquerda... Ele é diamentralmente contra o governo do PT, que é um partido de esquerda (assim classificado nessa mesma lista)
PL também não fica bem chamar de direita, já que está com o governo.

É isso.

Atenciosamente...

José San Martin July 7, 2005 00:29 (UTC)

Partido dos Trabalhadores & afins

Ai, mêo. Eu tinha escrito uma resposta tão longa e cuidadosa... Mas só agora que eu vi que isso aqui acabou não mandando!

Bem, eu escrevo de novo, fazer o quê?

Enfim, só passei aqui para dizer uma coisa, que você é um bom contraponto em discussões desse tipo.

Mas já que estou aqui... Agora estamos discutindo a Crise, a qual você chamaria de A Crise do Mensalão, mas eu acho melhor chamar de A Crise do Valérioduto.

O problema final é como financiar as campanhas dos partidos políticos. Há caixa 2 demais no ar em todos os partidos. Meu entendimento da situação é que o Valério repassava dinheiro de doadores tímidos que queriam dar algo aos partidos. As campanhas são muito, muito caras. Nem os R$ 100 milhões e nem o R$ 40 milhões que o PT e o PSDB (respectivamente) declararam à justiça em 2004 cubririam os gastos bilhadários das campanhas. Há muito caixa 2 em quase todas as campanhas do Brasil, você sabe.

Lembra aquelas notas fiscais do MV queimadas? Elas indicavam que ele tinha recebido dinheiro do Daniel Dantas. E a Conexão Lisboa DD é um grande canalha do mundo empresarial que - tendo ganho o controle dos investimentos do Citibank - ganhou o controle da Brasil Telecom e da Telemig Celular mesmo sendo acionista minoritário e as administrou em seu próprio proveito e em detrimento dos outros acionistas - em especial os fundos de pensão dos funcionários do Banco do Brasil e da Petrobras. Os fundos têm uma forte ligação com Luís Guishiken, que você sabe quem é. Os negócios de DD são bastante escusos, que podem ser facilmente desbaratados por algum governo. Segundo informação da Carta Capital, o Dantas - prevendo a vitória do PT - quis uma aproximação e ofereceu dinheiro ao PT, mas foi sumariamente refutado por Gushiken. Portanto, ele flertou com outra parte mais inescrupulosa do partido, enviando dinheiro via Marcos Valério. Pode ser que haja mensalão, mas analise de novo as notícias tendo em mente o que eu falei.

Bem, obrigado pela discussão! José San Martin 15:20, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Looks good

I should have a chance to work on it later tonight. Tfine80 17:05, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent

I should update the timeline and probably also add the information about the businesses from pt. I've noticed that the Portuguese article seems to be edited less now, and I keep reading articles that the scandal is slowing down. I would like to speak with you about the current situation. Best, Tfine80 00:23, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the English page is now the number 2 hit for mensalao in Google... Is that incredible or what? Tfine80 00:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Hey, I've been on vacation the last few days. I certainly will try to update the timeline at some point. Best, Tfine80 19:35, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being a bit AWOL on the Mensalao page. Nice update... I like all of pictures you put up on the pt page. Best, Tfine80 00:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. Will look at it. Merry Christmas! Tfine80 18:54, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Revision Help

Well, I'd like to help, but I don't see an actual draft at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Carlosar%5Cdraft. I was under the impression that you were going to translate the article from Portuguese to English, and then wanted some edit and clean-up, but now I'm confused.

MSTCrow 09:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Brazil politic Miguell Arraes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brazil politic Miguell Arraes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:FSP.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FSP.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 06:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And Image:MST.gif,Image:Forodesp board.jpg, Image:Baraoriobranco.jpg, Image:Brpan.gif, Image:Br EstadoSP logo.gif, Image:8-fsp.jpg, Image:MIRForodeSP.jpg, Image:Forosp1.jpg and Image:Fidelforosaopaulo.jpg --Iamunknown 06:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Dompedro-II.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dompedro-II.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 20:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ola.ogg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Ola.ogg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ola.ogg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ola.ogg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dpedro1.png

Thank you for uploading File:Dpedro1.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Royal-family.png

Thank you for uploading File:Royal-family.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Carlosar. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Carlosar~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]