Talk:Angiography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Angiography.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled

I find that "angiogram" now includes MR and CT methods for getting similar vascular anatomy information.

MR angiograms are useful for patients with limited renal function (usually reflected as elevated creatinine), as the iodine-based dyes used for conventional are somewhat nephrotoxic. MR angiograms can be obtained using time-of-flight sequences (which use velocity data for contrast) or a the usual gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Angiogram without a modifier is a fluoroscopic angiogram. There are CT/MRI variants, and digital subtraction angiograms, etc JFW | T@lk 09:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that MRA images are not of as higher resolution than CT Angiography? See Magnetic resonance angiography and Computed tomography angiography.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tedmolly0.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel prize

Egas Moniz's Nobel prize was for his work in psychosurgery, and not angiography, so I've removed the false reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.68.207 (talk) 18:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

dated photo?

How old is that photo? I had an angiogram/plasty this week and if I had entered that room (in the photo) I would have run for the door! Can a more recent image be used? Thanks Hu Gadarn 18:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

could someone update this page re: non-invasive methods?

I don't feel qualified to make modifications on this page, but came here after learning I would be getting a coronary angiogram later this week. What surprised me here is that the procedure I had described to me was a CT Scan, non-invasive (except for an IV to inject contrast), and lots less scary/dramatic than the procedure described on this page. Could someone familiar with the non-invasive procedure(s) update this? It'd be especially helpful for reassuring those of us facing the test (and our loved ones). Thanks! Melissa Ganus 29 Jan 2007

Note to all

I have done a small overhaul to the page, I hope this meets to everyones satisfaction! Heather 18:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Glitzy_queen00

Future heading makes no sense

In the "Future" section, there is reference to the past and present but nothing in that section makes any reference to the future. --Donlibes (talk) 18:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Free image available

There's a free image here: http://www.wjes.org/content/3/1/14. I just don't have time to upload it right now. If you'd like to upload it but don't know how, I'm glad to help, just drop me a note on my talk page. delldot ∇. 04:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why does "cineangiography" redirect here?

The term is not used or explained in the article. 86.159.197.174 (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Angiography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160106141048/http://www.medical.siemens.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?categoryId=12751&langId=-1&catalogId=-1&storeId=10001&catTree=100001,12764,12751&overviewId=12751&userviewId=12813&parentName=Angiography&level=0 to http://www.medical.siemens.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?categoryId=12751&langId=-1&catalogId=-1&storeId=10001&catTree=100001,12764,12751&overviewId=12751&userviewId=12813&parentName=Angiography&level=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Risks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast-induced_nephropathy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocontrast_agent#Adverse_effects

Can also cause thyroid problems (hyper-and-hypo-thyroidism), and angiograms cause 12% of acute kidney injuries. Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969626/ Isonomia-107 (talk) 08:26, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'angeion' or 'aggeion' transliteration?

Why is ἀγγεῖον transliterated as 'angeion' and not (logically) as 'aggeion' ? Lawrence18uk (talk) 20:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]