This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
I'm unsure as to the relationship between Bewley's Hotels and Campbell-Bewley - have they licenced the trademark or are they part of the group? One way or the other, I wanted to emphasise the connection (thought the way the page was phrased seemed a bit like a disambiguation page when the two are in fact closely related.) Blorg 17:33, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
There are a number of COI-related tags associated to this article. Two appear on the Talk page, and are intended to remind any COI editors of the COI guidelines. To my eye, these Talk-space tags continue to be necessary (as, quite recently, seemingly COI-motivated edits sought to add non-neutral/promotional language to the article). A further tag appears on the Article page, and seems intended to highlight non-neutral content. To my eye, this Article-space tag no longer seems required (as, as of the current revision, there wouldn't appear to be any overly non-neutral or promotional text remaining). Unless there are other thoughts, I am proposing to remove the tag from the Article-space. Though retain the advisories on this Talk-page. Guliolopez (talk) 21:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved It's been a week or so. And haven't heard any thoughts on the above. So have removed the COI clean-up template from the article-space page (as there aren't any overtly COI/promotional/tonal issues to address). But have not removed the COI notification template from this talk-space page (as there are still COI/SPA risks to highlight). Guliolopez (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]