Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Long Hair people
Appearance
Originally listed for deletion on January 20, 2005. Consensus was to delete. RedWolf 00:55, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
What about people who had different haircuts during different periods of their life? What about historical periods when almost everybody wore long hair? Does using a long wig qualify? Clearly an unmaintainable and less than useful category (and misnamed in any case). / up+land 09:57, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with delete, for the above reasons and for the reasons too many people change their hairdos throughout their lives. Mandel 16:13, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- What a worthless category. Delete. Postdlf 16:57, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Umm, if we won't delete it, the short haired people are going to think they have been discriminated against. Oy, I definite agree this is a worthless one. RedWolf 00:54, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Unless this category is used specifically for people known for having long hair (as appears to be the case with people like Crystal Gayle) its pointless, in either case i think this belongs as a List of people famous for their hair or something like that. Delete ALKIVAR™ 03:22, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- As a person with long hair, I am, of course, deeply offended that this has been listed for deletion. However, I will admit defeat and declare that this should really be deleted. Seriously, now. (A list wouldn't be a bad idea, though. With photographs.) -Aranel ("Sarah") 03:37, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete on the grounds that the spelling is wrong: it should be Category:Long-haired people. ;-) —Mike 04:33, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Silly category. -Willmcw 18:23, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. As dumb as the pregnant women category.Lokifer 01:55, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, but I have to wonder whether the original idea of this category got lost somewhere. One of the two articles in it is the Chinese activist known as Long Hair. Grutness|hello? 04:20, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)