User talk:Robert Dober
Very nice message, thanks for the corrections, I am not a native speaker, but that kind of help will allow me to improve my (rusty) English. I hope I will find some more time to read on styleguides etc, it is too tempting to type very soon. See you around. Robert_Dober 19:10 Oct 14, 2002 (UTC)
Hello there Robert, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Nice work on the contract bridge-related articles. Cheers! --maveric149
Hello. I took out the links from Contract bridge playing technique, because I thought they couild maybe all go on the same page. But having seen the article on Finesse, I realise there's a probably lot to be said on each. All the same, I'm wary of the 3-tier setup we now have, with contract bridge at the top and the playing technique article in the middle. I'm pondering merging the technique article into the main bridge page, but that's awfully long too. Maybe we can syphon some of that off to History of bridge? I'll leave that up to you, as I'm not knowledgeable on this subject. One other thing though: it's important to link back to articles, for example Finesse should have a link back to contract bridge. People can land on articles from anywhere, so it's vital to establish the context of something. Welcome to the 'pedia! :) -- Tarquin 18:52 Oct 15, 2002 (UTC)
I like that you're adding bridge techniques, and many of them (squeeze plays in particular) are not elsewhere covered well on the web. But they do tend to use some lower-level jargon that isn't here yet either. The squeezes, for example, talk about having the count or not; that is not covered here yet. Perhaps some more introductory material would be good. --LDC
There is a note for you at Talk:Progressive squeeze
- likewise Suicide squeeze and Squeezee. Please Wikipedia:establish context! -- Tarquin 10:50 2 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Contract bridge playing technique
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Contract bridge playing technique, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)