Talk:List of Canadian railways

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

comments

I believe you will find that Algoma Central Railway Inc still exists. See Federal government authority for railways here:

http://www.cta-otc.gc.ca/rail-ferro/companies/companies_e.html

R.L.Kennedy 01:37, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

While helpful, particularly for articles not yet created (red links), adding the various URLs to such railways, and comments about being subsidiaries, or other ownership appears messy and is starting to make this page less readable. I might start creating stub articles to place this information in. Plasma east 18:13, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I really don't see anything wrong with this page the way it is. The additional information re subsidiaries etc. is most useful. The links to corporate web site may be unnecessary to some extent.

R.L.Kennedy 01:41, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm with RL on this one - practically the only useful thing about a list as opposed to a category is that can include things that haven't been created yet. Fawcett5 04:28, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Another advantage is that often articles should be merged, for instance when a railroad company is renamed or reorganized. The list can include both names, while the category is stuck with only the new name. --SPUI (talk) 04:35, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I tend to agree that the page is more or less fine as it is. One small problem with the page (that I just noticed, actually) is that it doesn't seem to make a distinction between railways and railway companies (note also R.L.Kennedy's first comment). I'll see if I can fix this shortly. JYolkowski 14:14, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I just did. Please let me know if you have any comments. JYolkowski // talk 15:36, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I didn't mean any offense with my previous comments re. adding the links etc. In retrospect I think it was more a formatting problem than anything content-related. Now that we have the table created, I added some links for the holding companies, where the names of actual operating companies are unknown - these links should be replaced when anyone does find more information on the actual operating companies.Plasma east 14:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Categorization

Shouldn't the Ontario Northland Railway be listed under Passenger railways as well as freight? Reaperexpress (talk) 00:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the Apache Railway on this list? It is in the US. Reaperexpress (talk) 00:39, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding a category for urban rail transit systems. If museum-based railways (including heritage tramways) are on here, it clearly isn't a list limited to mainline railways.Reaperexpress (talk) 00:42, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Canadian railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717042517/http://www.proximityissues.ca/Maps/RAC-2004-QC_sub.pdf to http://www.proximityissues.ca/Maps/RAC-2004-QC_sub.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:04, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]