Talk:Spunge

Reggae Low‑importance

	This article is part of the Reggae WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the coverage of articles relating to ska and reggae. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.ReggaeWikipedia:WikiProject ReggaeTemplate:WikiProject ReggaeReggae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Quality of Article

I have added NPOV as this is the most biased article i have ever read - Betram

Is it me, or is this article absolutely cringeworthy? --taras 05:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You tell me! I wrote virtually all of it, pretty much scavenged from what they say about themselves and all their fansites. I stand by all the facts I wrote down though! What parts in particular do you reckon are cringeworthy? The article's lookin' a bit empty, maybe we could make it half-decent sometime. Dragonfly888 18:51, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

i'm sorry, but you're right, it is terrible. told me a few things i didn't know though, so it can't be too bad. - 3596.56.75.75.7575.753.75.75

It could do with a more formal register and less exclamation marks. Also the layout could be improved ten-fold. The table of contents doesn't appear until near the end of the article. Some good information though, just needs some refining.

I have removed a swathe of opinionated and unsourced material from the article, which is still a long way short of sufficient reliable sources. Can future editors please follow Wikipedia guidelines for editing, and leave the adulatory fancruft to other places. Please remember Wikipedia:Verifiability and note Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

videos

what about the music videos on p-rock? i can remember roots and jump on demand definately had videos. not sure about others.

You Are right so did One More Go and Centerfold.

Name

I turned all used of "[spunge]" back to "Spunge". Please take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks).--SeizureDog (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Manic Street Preachers were lined up to support them on an American tour, but had to cancel when Richey Edwards went missing the day before

I am deleting the above statement as it is absolute bollocks. Spunge only formed in 94 and only released their first ep in 1998 and Edwards went missing in 1995, and MSP were at that point already a far bigger band than [spunge] ever became. There is no way this is true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickwitter (talk • contribs) 22:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:That Should Cover It!.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:That Should Cover It!.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 June 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:That Should Cover It!.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spunge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090804101520/http://www.kickingpigeons.freeuk.com:80/features/raq.html to http://www.kickingpigeons.freeuk.com/features/raq.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:14, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]