Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Haggerty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. Carbonite | Talk 02:08, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not noteworthy. How many people sit on such boards throught the country? Delete. - UtherSRG 23:11, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. A county legislater, and I'm not even sure what country they're talking about (OK that Oakland is mentioned in passing makes me think its the US, but it doesn't even say). I imagine wikipedia would be roughly twice it's size and ten times as inanely boring if we include all people of this level. Also, this info will date quickly, and I'm sure we can't count on it being updated. -R. fiend 23:35, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 03:26, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Normally I'd speak up in favour of local politicians but I think in instance we're under the radar. Delete. Slac speak up! 05:32, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Scott Haggerty is a twice relected supervisor in one of the most populous (2002 pop. 1,444,656) and fast growing counties in California. This is noteworthy. I just finished wikifing the article Klonimus 05:41, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete. In his favor, Scott has 11 unique hits in Google news. If one or two had been about him, I would have made a case to keep. As it is, they are all simply him-as-a-convenient-person-to-interview about some local issue, like a highway project. Shimmin 12:08, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
- The fact that he was chosen to be interviewed suggests that he is a notable person. Klonimus 18:10, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Heck, I have been interviewed at least five times for a variety of newspaper articles. Radiant_* 11:38, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.