Talk:1980 United States presidential election

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1980 United States presidential election article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 180 days

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Should we still’s have John Anderson in the Infobox?

As the title suggests, he only won 6.6 percent of the vote and didn’t make Reagan loose any states. Qutlooker (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By American historical standards, 6.6 percent was a substantial showing for an independent candidate for POTUS (as compared to, say, Barry Commoner). It has been suggested that he helped split the anti-Reagan vote, not that he made Reagan lose any states. I think he definitely should stay. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He should definitely stay. After all, he was in one of the debates (with Reagan).Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All Wiki Boxs for elections in the USA show canidates with above 5% of the vote, he also was very influential and competed in the debates Flogdafrog (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Details about Chappaquiddick incident need to be included in the article

People won't always read the linked source.2601:447:4100:1BE0:E059:C871:9CA2:2686 (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is necessary to have that level of detail. Also (something I didn't mention in my edit summary), I think the way the addition was phrased was not NPOV. So that killed two birds with one stone. Rja13ww33 (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it relates to the reason why Ted Kennedy was vulnerable in the 1980 election. The incident was not a typical controversy, but one that involved controversially taking a human life. That would very likely turn off voters.2601:447:4100:1BE0:E059:C871:9CA2:2686 (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah but the way it was phrased really presents a issue. Saying "not only" did he drive a woman off a bridge, but he ran off without rescuing her. Oh, and he also "evaded" prison time. All that is loading the dice. According to him, he made several dives on the car....and saying he evaded prison is basically a POV statement that he should have gotten prison. The incident has so many moving parts that I thought just linking to it was best. Rja13ww33 (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But that's what happened. He evaded prison and only got his drivers license suspended.137.70.164.141 (talk) 22:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again: it is a POV statement. And two people hardly constitute a consensus. Rja13ww33 (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]