User talk:Pwilk

Please note that Nicolas Kaviani has been listed for deletion. You are welcome to join the deletion debate. --Hemanshu 05:22, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:CKHS logo small.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CKHS logo small.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of orbital launch systems

I reverted your change on the Atlas rocket in Comparison of orbital launch systems. Wikipedia itself is not a reference, it cannot be cited. If there is something in another article you wish to cite, track down the origin of the information (if the article is well-written, the citation should be easy to find), and cite that reference instead. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 03:25, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips and edits! Avoiding self-reference in Wikipedia seems reasonable. The "Comparison of orbital launch systems" and "Comparison of orbital launchers families pages" are pretty redundant, and will probably be a pain to keep updated and consistent if they are not allowed to reference more primary wikipedia pages. For instance, the Atlas V page has a unique reference for every single launch and to reference each of those for the current 42 launches would be tedious and visually unappealing to have 42 references in the little box on the table for number of launches of the Atlas V in the Comparison pages. Thoughts? Pwilk (talk) 10:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Pwilk! Thank you for your contributions. I am N2e and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! N2e (talk) 05:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips and edits! Avoiding self-reference in Wikipedia seems reasonable. The "Comparison of orbital launch systems" and "Comparison of orbital launchers families pages" are pretty redundant, and will probably be a pain to keep updated and consistent if they are not allowed to reference more primary wikipedia pages. For instance, the Atlas V page has a unique reference for every single launch and to reference each of those for the current 42 launches would be tedious and visually unappealing to have 42 references in the little box on the table for number of launches of the Atlas V in the Comparison pages. Thoughts? Pwilk (talk) 10:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. And welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your edits.

Getting started on Wikipedia can be a bit challenging for new editors, as we have evolved a number of community and encyclopedia standards that are seemingly Greek to newbie editors. For example, in a couple of edits you made a few hours ago, after my initial welcome of 05:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC) above, you may have run afoul of something—but I'm not going to hammer you with it right now.

I'm happy to have you editing Wikipedia with us! There's a lot to do to make this the encyclopedia of human knowledge that is our vision. And I always encourage new editors to find a subject area or two they are interested in and dig in. Cheers. N2e (talk) 12:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]