Talk:Crown (British coin)

Last crown

It says here that the last crown was in 1980. But I seem to have got one from 1981, with Charles & Di on. Presuming it IS a crown. Looks like one, but I'm no expert. -Nommo

Drat -- you're right, I overlooked that one and thought the Queen Mum's 80th birthday one was the last. Thanks for bringing it up -- Arwel 21:42 20 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Value?

I came looking for what a non-commemerative crown had been worth in L/s/d, and eventually found 5s after almost stopping reading, believing 5L would be the only value mentioned. Could someone who understands the chronology better than i fix the chronology better than i have?
--Jerzy•t 17:27 & 17:38, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

I think a big part of the problem is that this was written as an article not on the currency as used, but as collected today. I doubt the topic is worth two articles, and if not, the one should serve both purposes; much stricter attention to chronology is probably the best aid to accomplishing that.
--Jerzy•t 17:38, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BritishCrown.jpeg

Image:BritishCrown.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Done, by Arwel Parry. 1 June 2007

Queen's Remembrancer

Please see Talk:Queen's_Remembrancer#Crowns. Perhaps someone here can clarify this problem. 90.245.25.126 (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crown (British coin). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20140402091832/https://www.spink.com/press-releases/spink-sets-new-world-record-for-a-silver-english-coin.aspx to https://www.spink.com/press-releases/spink-sets-new-world-record-for-a-silver-english-coin.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Let's just take out the "value" tag completely

It is obvious no satisfactory common ground or compromise can be reached. I have tried very hard, but breakdowns in mutual understanding just mean there is no possible solution beyond omitting it. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Discussion centralised at talk:Pound sterling#"Value =" in infoboxes for historic sterling coinage. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Weight

"Since the Great Recoinage of 1816, a crown has, as a general rule, had a diameter of 38.61 millimetres (1.520 in), and weighed 28.276 grams (defined as 10⁄11 troy ounce).[9][10]" How much did it weigh before? I was googling for that, for the weight in 1650. This is helpful for the value question. How much would that silver be worth at hte 2020 price of silver? editeur24 (talk) 13:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

While I do not have any pre-1662, hammered silver crowns at hand, I have just checked several milled ones dated from 1673/VICESIMO (Charles II second bust, SCBC 3357) to 1937 (George VI, SCBC 4078; last silver crown minted, even if only .500), all in VF+ to EF condition, and found all to be of similar shape, diameter and weight, viz. 1673: 37.4-37.8mm, 30.00g / 1819: 37.5mm, 28.16g / 1887: 38.3-38.6mm, 28.28g / 1937: 38.4-38.6mm / 28.32g (my last decimal digit always a bit dubious due to my limited equipment). At Sterling fineness (.925), used from the middle ages to 1919, 28.276g (10⁄11 troy ounce) equals 26.155g fine silver; at today's rate of USD 22.453 per fine oz silver, this amounts to USD 18.88; hope this helps. --HReuter (talk) 23:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)