Jump to content

Talk:Constitutional status of Cornwall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Constitutional status of Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Constitutional status of Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutional status of Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Constitutional status of Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write or re-direct?

[edit]

This article is almost entirely agenda driven by Cornish nationalists, an academic fringe group. The detail is either off-topic, uncited, or backed by sources not properly interpreted or of dubious reliability. The status of this article was questioned extensively after it was created (see talk) but nothing much seems to have happened since then. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:55, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

>> This is a serious accusation of bias, and an attack on fellow contributors. Please may I suggest you provide evidence of bias and state the elements that you believe are off-topic or uncited, then others may respond positivley and decide on whether a rewrite is necessary. Artowalos (talk) 12:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Artowalos.[reply]

This whole article would leave a person with no knowledge of the subject, under the impression that Cornwall's constitutional status is debatable, unclear, and it implies Cornwall is or should be a seperate state. This is all despite the fact that Cornwall has always been part of England for England's entire existance, the status of Cornwall is very much confirmed as part of England.
This lenghy article about alleged and uncited arguments for and against is typical of Wikipedia's worst side, use as a political agenda machine which somehow avoids deletion for years.
What does this article accomplish? It's almost like it's been designed purely to stir up some kind of artificial racial hatred between St George and St Piran flag wavers.
Anything important about the status of Cornwall... is on the Wikipedia page for Cornwall.
If this page doesn't deserve deletion, why shouldn't a "Constitutional Status of Lancashire" page also be formed? It's a newer county, with a duchy too, and Andy Burnham has said the government doesn't care about that area.
Clearly this whole page is drivel and ignores facts in favour of a few personal anti English ideologies.
 92.41.42.172 (talk) 19:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Constitutional_status_of_Cornwall&oldid=1205413770"