Talk:Kremvax
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
FOLDOC Content
[edit]This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.
(This disclaimer moved here from article mainspace by Tpdwkouaa (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC))
Old talk
[edit]The content the edit warring is going on over is in my opinion POV and needs to either be removed or significantly reworked. Everyking 01:23, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
How would you recommend reworking the paragraph in question? --Aika 16:45, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
"it is believed by many that years of speculation that totalitarianism would prove unable to maintain its grip" - References? ; "as Yeltsin and the new Russian revolutionaries of glasnost and perestroika" - definately POV ; Willard 19:09, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- Months have passed since Willard's perfectly reasonable request, and no reference is forthcoming. I've removed the particularly POV sentence at the end - it's typical Eric S. Raymond ranting; such fact-free POV doesn't belong here. -- Middenface 00:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- I fixed a couple more howling POV problems with the remaining part of the last paragraph, but I'm still very unhappy about it. We wouldn't, surely, let some other random website's article claim it had such an important part in history without a molecule of evidence , so I don't know why we let this one either. Barring sources cited, I think the whole last paragraph should be removed as unverified and questionable. -- Middenface 00:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Vadim Antonov
[edit]I'm not sure the redirect from Vadim Antonov to this page is reasonable. Kevink707 (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
April Fools post 1988
[edit]The 'Spafford Spoof', a helpful howto message titled Subject: Warning: April Fools Time again (forged messages on loose), was posted to usenet. It purported to be from Gene Spafford but was apparently spoofed by Chuq Von Rospach; the return path included moscvax.
wayback archive canonical url 35111-F (alt link) Ahazred8 (talk) 02:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Unknown-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- Start-Class Russia (mass media) articles
- Mass media in Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class Soviet Union articles
- Low-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles