Jump to content

Talk:Abraham Lincoln

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleAbraham Lincoln is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleAbraham Lincoln has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 5, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 16, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
October 8, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
December 24, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 18, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
February 22, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
September 23, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
September 16, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 16, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 16, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 1, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 9, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 4, 2004, April 14, 2004, April 14, 2005, and February 12, 2009.
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

Tom Hanks?

[edit]

While it is good trivia, I'm not sure what relevance there is to pointing out Lincoln's familial relationship (citation?) to Tom Hanks. It might be relevant to point out that Hanks is related to Lincoln on Hanks page, but on Lincoln's it should maybe be a "fun fact". Just my opinion, I'll leave it to the experts (Doris Kearns Goodwin, where are you?) to sort out. Chris van Hasselt (talk) 14:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. Alanscottwalker (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • At over 13,000 words, WP:TOOBIG suggests that some of the text should be reduced or spun out.
  • One of the reasons why it is large is the numerous large block quotes used in the article. I think these should be summarised, reduced, and/or removed.
  • The end of "Historical reputation" has a lot of random facts and quotes. I think this needs to be edited for things to be removed.
  • There is uncited text in the article, including citation needed tags from March 2024.

Is anyone willing to address the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:56, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]