Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Cuisset
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT without merging. No voters wanted the content preserved; the only conflict was whether a redirect should remain, over which there was no consensus. Please feel free to relist the redirect on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion for a separate discussion on that issue. Postdlf 23:16, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
President of Delphine Software. That's it. Delete, unless we're told something ever so slightly interesting about him. -- Hoary 06:51, 2005 May 2 (UTC)
- The wiki article on Delphine Software says it shut down in 2004 and says he was "company lead designer". But unless someone can expand on him, delete it. Grev 07:45, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete as just another not-sufficiently-notable failed entrepreneur. Some of the company's games are well-known enough to have gotten WP articles or redirects, but that doesn't persuade me that the bankrupt company should keep an article or keep redirects among its erstwhile names. I'm definitely not persuaded that the former "company lead designer" and president (was he also the cook and chief bottle-washer?) is encyclopedic. Barno 19:52, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. It seems that everything notable about him is already on the Delphine Software. If he has no notability outside that context, this article must go. Quale 22:25, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- What's wrong with redirecting to Delphine Software? RickK 23:34, May 2, 2005 (UTC)
- There's lots wrong with redirect. If he's not notable enough for an article on his own, he's not notable enough for a redirect. In the future, if WP has an article on a notable Paul Cuisset then the redir will force a disambig. Good editorial taste in an encyclopedia doesn't just consist of everything you add — what you choose leave out is just as important. Quale 03:35, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- nothing at all - Redirect as above. SteveW | Talk 01:17, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect SchmuckyTheCat 00:22, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.