Talk:Common Alerting Protocol

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have created this article with some reilance on the CAP OASIS publication, but I have made sufficient changes and additions to the text to deem it my own. Please feel free to add further information so that we can make this article a worthwhile wikipedia publication Tomer

POV check

This article is quite promotional of CAP, especially the later sections. It needs some reworking to make it neutral. --K. AKA Konrad West TALK 09:40, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A slightly less passionate version

I've reworked Tomer's initial text to remove some of the advocacy that characterized most of the early CAP documents.

- Art Botterell

Usage

I ran across CAP for the first time on the US National Weather Service's[1] website today. I haven't found any information on how it differs from RSS, and how an end-user might make use of it. Can someone enlighten me, please?--Woden325 15:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protocol?

CAP is not actually a protocol, is it? As I read it, it's just a message format (I guess Common Alerting Markup Language didn't sound good enough). Should the article make that distinction clear? -Jeff Worthington 20:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Examples?

Since this is XML, there's no reason for a missing example, is there? rhyre (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CAP formatted alerts are rather lengthy and well documented elsewhere. A brief description of the format and a link to the CAP Standard would, I'm sure, suffice without bulking up the article too much. Having a link to the official source is also better in that when the standard is changed (as the group is currently in the process of moving forward to CAP 1.2 and, in the not too distant future, CAP 2.0), the link can be simply updated rather than having to deal with monitoring and maintaining a lengthy block of XML code w.r.t. specification updates, vandals, etc. (Steelerdon (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The article should have examples, especially the corner cases. The protocol DOM model is very badly done, which raises doubts about how exceptional cases should be addressed (The examples in the PDF document cover only the most basic situations) 200.189.118.162 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cited sources vs. external links

There are a lot of external links in the article. Would it make more sense and be cleaner to provide the information contained in those links and then cite the source. In other words, rather than saying "according to ______, this is the case" it could read "here are some facts" and reference it in the usual way. (Steelerdon (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I've converted the inline external links to reference footnotes. — Quicksilver^{T @} 02:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My Revert

Leaving a note here, for some reason I can not type in the edit summary box today... weird. Anyway, I reverted the change the IP made because it changed a blue linked target to a red linked target and gave no reason or source for the change. Jbh ^Talk 21:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And... self rv... clicked through to CMAS and looks like its name was changed and the red link was just a typo. Fixed it. Sorry. Jbh ^Talk 21:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common Alerting Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100629014918/http://www.fema.gov:80/emergency/ipaws/ to http://www.fema.gov/emergency/ipaws/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Common Alerting Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513144112/http://www.sdr.gov/NDIS_rev_Oct27.pdf to http://www.sdr.gov/NDIS_rev_Oct27.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020928072102/http://www.ppw.us/ to http://www.ppw.us/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fema.gov/emergency/ipaws/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]