User talk:EAi

Stoke Newington farmers market

I dont think this should be deleted from the London farmers market article. Its different status should be noted perhaps, but its still a farmers market in the usual sense. Justinc 22:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Er, you changed it to be about the London farmers market company. It was about farmers markets in general before that. It could be split in tw but I dont really see the point. Justinc 00:00, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, well I think I wrote that bit before I came across Stoke Newington. Stoke Newington is interesting, and should have either have its own article, or be mentioned, as it is certified by the National Association of Farmers Markets which seems a reasonable criterion (the title of the article is also lower case, should be upper case if it is the London Farmers Market company). As I said I dont really mind which way it is, but I dont think Stoke N should be deleted either way. I guess I should go there and take a look some time. Justinc 00:56, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasnt proposing to include any that are not listed here ie certified. I will look at rewording a bit when I get a chance. Justinc 10:04, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ok, seperate article for the company and then an overview is fine by me, lets work towards that. I will try to go to Stokey and find out a bit more but it doesnt look like being this Saturday. Justinc 23:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalite

I have already unblocked him, as he emailed me. I saw the "Vandal" part of it and figured it was yet another vandal account. Oh well. --Phroziac _. o º^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 02:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It's really no big deal. --Phroziac _. o º^{O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!)} 14:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

clark's powers

you need exspand your smallville article

(I have no smallville article) EAi 02:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did quite a bit of expansion on it. What do you think? omegadirective 00:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(I still have no smallville article) EAi 00:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The other day I was working on a kind of "help desk" on The CW web site and found a link to an article which no longer existed. It's not really a help desk but an archive I created. You help yourself and the answer may not be there. But I had the link there and decided to create a redirect. I also added to the section some new information about "Smallville".Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just wanted to say a quick thank you for reverting that vandalism on my user page today. Rmkf1982 | Talk 22:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

I must have skipped you by mistake, I have approved you now. Prodego ^talk 01:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hei

am nt doing nething....it seems soemeone is using my IP address...i will contact my service provider. 82.194.62.22 19:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Modem light

I asked a question on the computing reference desk and did not think to come to the site all weekend. The problem was apparently fixed on Thursday. I have had no problems whatsoever since.

What was usually happening was that when I got a message on the screen that the computer could not connect to the Internet, I would look down at the modem and the middle light would usually be blinking in a consistent pattern. If the Internet is working, it's on. The tech support person said it should always be on if the computer is off, but when the computer was off over the weekend before a day when the company was having problems (a call to tech support was answered with a message saying the company was having problems), the blinking was taking place when the computer was off. Not so in this latest episode.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EAi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EAi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EAi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bill Dare

The article Bill Dare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article. Only found trivial mentions of the subject, does not seem to pass WP:NBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]