User talk:Audiovideo

You can leave messages here. I may reply here - so watch this page.

Page move

Excuse me, but I know how to move a page. The page that I moved to already existed and had its OWN history, which I did not want to delete. Thank you. Páll 08:01, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for un-moving the page - though I support PZFUN's move, it was done without consensus on the Talk page. A vote has started on the renaming now. Wizzy 08:29, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

Welcome

Let me be the first to welcome you to Wikipedia! Seems you have found a lot on your own - let me point out WP:POST, a good summary page of what is going on in the WP world .. Wizzy 08:35, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

Morbid warning template

The template was deleted, but it appears that Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse still works because a more general purpose version that was created at Template:Photo warning by User:Flamurai a few weeks ago. I'm a little surprised that such a narrow vote was called for delete, but I think the new template is even better. Cool Hand Luke 03:24, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for the vote at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Henrygb2. It has made my week. --Henrygb 01:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Zürich to Zurich

Zürich has been nominated on Wikipedia:Requested moves for a page move to Zurich. Perhapse you might like to express your opinion about this proposed move on talk:Zürich. Philip Baird Shearer 10:47, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Autofellatio 2.jpg IfD Vote comment

In reference to your message to me:

You said: "Considering the support Image:Charlotterossnypdblue.jpg is getting--a picture which has no illustrative value at all, and appeals only to prurience--it's clear to me that homophobia is behind a great deal of these votes." Now that it turns out that it only got 5 votes to keep and was deleted, are you prepared to withdraw that personal attack? --Audiovideo 01:40, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

At the time I made that comment the mix of votes for the image was different. However, in any case, I didn't intend it as a personal attack: a personal attack is just that--personal, and I wouldn't presume to know any individual's motivation for voting beyond what they write in the vote discussion. However, yes, I do believe homophobia is behind some of the votes to delete on the autofellatio image ("A great deal" may be overstating the case). If you in any way thought I was painting you with that brush, please accept my sincere apology. Demi ^T/_C 01:52, 2005 Apr 9 (UTC)

Pronouns

Thanks for your comments. No, I don't have a problem with pronouns - as you imply, I have continued their use after the first naming at the beginning of a paragraph. I guess I simply prefer to restate the subject at the beginning of the paragraph and use a consistent style. I appreciate that the surname alone can seem aggressive to some people, but I felt this is better than Mr X, Firstname Lastname or the other variations that I have come across. I'll bear your point in mind and try not to be quite so prescriptive - the main point of my edits has been to reflect that many are no longer MPs.

Thanks again. Mtiedemann 23:48, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

SuperDude comment

I truly cannot thank you enough for the kind words. I admit to feeling as if I'd taken part in a lynching once I found out about that fellow's condition. It was frustrating to think that I was trying to help a troll! I couldn't be happier to learn this wasn't the case and that the request for comment had a very positive outcome. Great user name, BTW! I studied video production in college and I still enjoy getting behind a Betacam or some such lovely feelie. :^P Anyway, do take care and thank you again. I'll be incommunicado over the weekend so perhaps we'll chat next week. - Lucky 6.9 04:48, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Template:Counties of Ireland

I have reverted your edit at Template:Counties of Ireland as this intended for Counties of Ireland and not Districts of Northern Ireland - their is a significant difference that is easly overlooked. Djegan 14:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just a thought

This may not satisfy all of your needs, but if you don't show some support, we're not likely to get even this much. — Xiong 熊 talk * 10:46, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Babel

Could you consider adding this template to your userpage? It is very helpful in case translators are needed and such.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 15:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Request for your vote

I saw that you voted against the adminship of William M Connolly. I reviewed said candidate's actions on the Cold Fusion article and determined them to indeed be very biased and uncivil. I haven't looked at WC's actions on the aetherometry article yet though. The vast support for WC is truly disturbing. I am a candidate for the arbitration council. William M Connolly is precisely the type of biased and uncivil person that I would fight against.

I request that you review my candidate statement and questions at: Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_January_2006/Vote/LawAndOrder , and consider voting for me, though only if you have suffrage for arbitration committee elections (registered before 9/30/2005, and have over 150 edits before 1/9/2006). The votes are vastly against me, so I will not win, but I have very few support votes, so voting for me will at least show that I (who is on your side) am less of a pariah. LawAndOrder 21:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GWU

Hello, I'm trying (again) to get The George Washington University moved to George Washington University. Since you weighed in on this when it came up last year, I thought you might like to weigh in again. john k 23:30, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to have happened--Audiovideo 20:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail

AV, would you mind e-mailing me, please? SlimVirgin ^(talk) 02:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would mind. I am very unhappy with your behaviour over WP:ATT and I doubt I could remain civil in private conversation. --Audiovideo 11:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's an issue I would like to discuss with you, and you might prefer that it's in private. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 00:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please contact ArbCom

Please contact Arbcom via our mailing list or via any of our individual emails regarding your status. Thank you. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 15:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Henry Bottomley

An editor has nominated Henry Bottomley, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Bottomley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funny Foreign Squiggle listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Funny Foreign Squiggle. Since you had some involvement with the Funny Foreign Squiggle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epistles of John for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epistles of John is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistles of John until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 15:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Point9999999.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Point9999999.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Vieque (talk • ctb) 21:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Betting odds" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Betting odds and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 18#Betting odds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bonoahx (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]