User talk:Revasser
Circumcision
[edit]Please follow the references. Everything I brought in the text is either a direct quote or a direct paraphrase of the sources listed. There is no original synthesis on my part. Thank you. -- Avi 23:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on circumcision. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.
Revasser, you appear to have made three reverts in the space of 24 hours at the circumcision article, here, here and here. Please heed the warning above and please consult the three-revert rule policy page. If you wish to discuss the edit you are trying to make at circumcision, please do so on the article talk page. Beejaypii (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Penis. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ... richi (hello) 15:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)