Talk:Blackburn (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria High‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Disambiguation

Can we please consider changing the disambiguation reference from Blackburn (disambiguation) to Blackburn (the town). Anyone looking at this page will have typed in the article title directly or been referenced from a page dealing with the general election. The point is that no one will read this page in confusion as to which particular Blackburn this article is referring to.

There may possible be confusion with Blackburn in West Lothian, Scotland. This could be delt with as follows:

This article refers to the constituency of Blackburn in Lancashire. For information on the town, see Blackburn

TreveX 14:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have now changed the disambiguation header. If you disagree or want to revert the change, please discuss it here. TreveX 19:14, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you do is likely to be overwritten by the WikiProject when we get around to settling upon a standard boilerplate for disambiguation between towns, boroughs, constituencies, and whatnot. There are ... ahem ... quite a lot of articles that eventually will have such disambiguations, and the aim will be for them to be uniform (in part because with Wikinews and Wikipedia combined we are trying to out-do or at least equal the election results coverage of other on-line news services, and thus a uniform approach for readers is a good thing). See Wikinews:Results of 2005 United Kingdom General Election, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies/Progress, and Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliamentary Constituencies/Progress/Example. Uncle G 02:25, 2005 May 2 (UTC)

Standard boilerplates are all very well, but may not help the user in some cases if it links to a disambiguation page. Many towns return, such as Blackburn, return a single Member of Parliament. Where this is the case, a link from the constituency article to the corresponding town is more useful to the reader than a link to a disambiguation page. TreveX 12:20, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Layout of Election Results

This is very confusing as each section goes newest to oldest so there is no continuity between sections. These pages used to be great but the new table layout is absolutely dreadful and causes this kind of disconnectivity. 92.19.233.199 (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User 92....., I agree with you about the tabulated layout being dreadful, and I would fully support you changing it to the stand alone blocks. Given that this is a current constituency, I suppose the more recent should be higher. Have fun with it. Graemp (talk) 21:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blackburn (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]