User talk:Mazadillon

Leave notes for me here and I'll read them and then move them into the archive.

Notes Archive

You can use your user page for information about you. This "ytalk page" is for other Wikipeidans to leave you messages. Please do not edit the {welcome} template; it's used by all Wikipedians to welcome others. Any questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page (use the link next to my name). Cheers, Whosyourjudas (talk) 21:06, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

it's no problem - i made all the newbie mistakes too (i still mess up sometimes!). don't worry about them; someone will catch any mistakes you might make. the best way to revert a change is to go to the page's history, pick the version you want, and save it to the article. good luck! Whosyourjudas (talk) 21:13, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Dancing lasha tumbai cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dancing lasha tumbai cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AVH NYC Beat.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AVH NYC Beat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:David Whitfield Cara Mia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David Whitfield Cara Mia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PPS3

The PPS3 article has the following:

Creation of sustainable, inclusive and mised communities

mised? Is that a typo? I can't figure it out! Rjm at sleepers (talk) 17:48, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Family and Parenting Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Family and Parenting Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family and Parenting Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]