User talk:Frogcat

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Lst27 (talk) 01:18, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Nien-Ling Wacker

A tag has been placed on Nien-Ling Wacker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George D. Watson (Dendodge).Talk^Help 17:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nien-Ling Wacker has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The article looks like a direct copy of a company press release. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, we get too many spam/nonnotable articles to be able to let them all sit for 24 hours. The title Nien-Ling Wacker isn't going anywhere -- please don't repost unless and until the article complies with the guidelines cited above. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 17:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- sorry. I'm typing straight into the Edit Page. As far as I can tell, I'm Having to "recreate" the citations so far by resubmitting. sorry.

- - I'm going to move the deleted text to your userspace at User:Frogcat/Nien-Ling Wacker. For the second time -- don't repost until you've taken out the corporate advertising. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 17:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ahh... So I need to edit it over there first. I think I understand...

User:Frogcat/Nien-Ling Wacker is the sandbox for editing

Nomination of Laserfiche for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laserfiche is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laserfiche (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‑ Iridescent 10:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laserfiche for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laserfiche is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laserfiche (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HighKing⁺⁺ 18:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laserfiche for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laserfiche is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laserfiche (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lightoil (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]