Talk:Multiple instruction, multiple data

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Earlier comments

I Don't find it very especial, ya guys check it out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.219.86.167 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 5 November 2004 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, what is SMC? 61.21.54.4 23:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bold edit

I decided to add some commentary worth having to this article. It began with a small edit war in the Cell microprocessor article where I'm bobbling around parragraphs making useless invocations of MIMD/SIMD terminology long past their best-before date. So many people persist in attempting to apply these old concepts to new designs, it's tragic.

When possible, I like to make my writing interesting, esp. if the subject itself is on the dry side. I've had a few of my more interesting contributions to the WP redacted by the aspy types who don't see why Faggin deserves a mention in an article about MIMD/SIMD. Because his line is funny and with just two short sentences invokes the time machine of a twenty-five year shift in design ethos more effectively than any two paragraphs of my own composition. And it's neat history for people to pursue, almost a little Easter-egg of a sort. I don't see why WP shouldn't broaden the reader's interest base when the opportunity arrises to slip something in.

I don't think this article should be explaining these technical four-letter-words to childen (the next generation) without also providing some context as to their original scope of validity. Hopefully people will enjoy my slightly screedish take on the subject and not get too twisted up over POV waking some unsuspecting reader out of their routine stupor. MaxEnt 08:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not appropriate

This screed is wholly inappropriate. If you're going to add POV comments, you have to back them up with verifiable sources. Simply inserting your opinion is not good enough. Ideogram 21:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Complete wrong?

I would say that MIMD is about Superscalar, Pipelining and VLIW/EPIC. Shared Memory Model and Distributed memory is about multiprocesors--Irbian (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading image

I think that File:MIMD.svg is misleading because it shows 2 banks each of 4 processors and suggests that the processors in a bank are all executing the same instruction. This is possible, but usually the processors are independent. I suggest just showing 4 processors each with an arrow from the data pool and an arrow from the program pool. JonH (talk) 22:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MIMD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016215430/http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/mimd to http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/mimd

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about point-to-point interconnects?

Can that connect non-uniform memory access or shared memory? WorldQuestioneer (talk) 22:43, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 14:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MIMD → Multiple instruction, multiple data – Propose to move the article title to the full name as it immediately becomes more descriptive and easily recognizable for users somewhat familiar with computer architecture, by recognizing the words "instruction" and "data". However, this may however conflict with WP:TITLEFORMAT. The same change has been proposed for SISD, SIMD, MISD, MIMD). Sauer202 (talk) 13:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support the acronym seems common but this source does suggest the longer name has some common usage. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.