Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debunk

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged - SimonP 16:51, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Debunk

I think this can never be more than a dictionary defenition, and wiktionary already has an entry for it. Elpaw 16:48, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete It's still up to you guys, but I added a bit about the usage of the term and the etymology. I can also add a link to Wiktionary, which I think I'll do right now. Thanks.
Delete -- but without objection, I think this can be speedied, rather than VfD'd.. Chiacomo 16:50, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I'm new round here. Elpaw 16:54, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Great, welcome to wikipedia -- thanks for being bold! I'm not an admin, but I'm going to change the tag to a speedy delete if you (or no one else) cares. --Chiacomo 17:08, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete is fine, but I'd like to redirect it to theory or something similarly appropriate. Radiant_* 17:28, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Shall we mark it for redirect? --Chiacomo 18:07, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone comes up with a sensible redirect. This is an encyclopedic topic, but the current article is not a useful start. Kappa 18:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP new article, thank you Aristides. Kappa 23:18, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, still a dictdef. RickK 23:42, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
- Even if you think it's still a dictdef, it has potential for expansion to cover notable cases of debunking, methods used, and people who do it. Kappa 00:30, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, that would certaily be at Debunking, wouldn't it? And surely there would be a more descriptive title? Rick K 04:13, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to Debunker. That's a stub that could do with expansion. Megan1967 04:57, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Good find Megan, might be best to merge both and move them to RickK's idea of debunking. Kappa 07:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
As the root verb, this wants to be Keeped and debunker merged and redirected here. Purely a semantic point. --Simon Cursitor 07:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I think Wikipedia standard would be to put this at Debunking. 66.60.159.190 16:21, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.