Talk:Latent homosexuality

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Untitled

This may mean a hidden inclination or potential for interest in homosexual relationships, which is either suppressed or not recognised, and which has not yet been explored "for real" or may never be explored in fact.

In other words something that can be postulated arbitrarily, as convinient for arguments that can't be disproven because it is "latent".

Talk pages don't exist for this kind of debate. TaintedMustard 17:54, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But this article fails to explain what "latent" actually means. --74.101.43.43 (talk) 14:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image caption

The image at the top of the article showed an individual who is identified on the image page. The caption suggested that he might be a latent homosexual. I'm pretty sure that that is against WP:BLP#Images, so I'm removing it. Scolaire (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about replacing it with a picture of that "god hates fags" guy? He is the obvious poster child. 75.191.151.75 (talk) 23:27, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Latent homosexuality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828010959/http://web.morons.org/menagerie/books/homogen6.jsp to http://web.morons.org/menagerie/books/homogen6.jsp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On Links to Homophobia

I edited the part that was suggesting that the cited study "indicated" that homophobes were repressed homosexuals, since this is not what the study indicates, something that was also explained later on the paragraph.

Moreover, I'd like to change the current cited study to this one that is more recent and done better, but I lack the linguistical skills (I'm not a native english speaker). Psy.hip (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]