Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Kennedy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 11:56, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Kennedy

Smells of vanity from a kilometre away. Delete. — JIP | Talk 12:22, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As you may have guessed, all the "keep" votes are by the same anonymous user, who hasn't signed any of his comments. This counts as sockpuppetry, so the votes should be disregarded. — JIP | Talk 06:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:That is a lie Lilkimloving 17:49, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In response to this, many are on the same campus and as such all appear to have the same external IP address 129.67.43.240 13:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Funny and true - and should therefore stay...anyway, it is hardly entirely flattering

True -- possibly ? Funny -- to whom ? Wiki-worthy -- beg leave to doubt. Delete, even if he revises his mile-high standing. --Simon Cursitor 12:51, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Funny to all - wiki-worthy fo sho...

dab the figure skater and the folk musicain. The vain child should do try to do something notable. Dunc|☺ 13:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Observation: both of the unsigned "Funny" comments above were contributed by the same anon, 129.67.43.240, who should at least learn to sign his/her entries with ~~~~. RussBlau 13:57, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, WP:VAIN. R adiant _* 14:49, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete: Contributor should go play outside, as Wikipedia is not the bathroom stall for writing your self-praise upon. Geogre 15:15, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I didn't write it myself - it was one of my many, many fans...PK

unsigned comment by anon user User:129.67.43.240. — JIP | Talk 06:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Moronic and irrelevant. Scimitar

Keep Wikipedia may not be "the bathroom stall for writing your self-praise upon", but who decreed that it has to be a forum only for those without a sense of humour? I happen to know that it was NOT the illustrious Peter Kennedy himself who contributed this article, and I think we who claim to be his fans have as much a right to celebrate our idol as anyone else.

unsigned comment by anon user User:129.67.43.240. — JIP | Talk 06:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Moronic? The author of this article actually produced some fairly subtle and intelligent humour. I would challenge any of the "delete it" crowd to produce something which would bring a smile to as many people's faces. Irrelevant? Um, last time I checked every article on this site was irrelevant to almost all of the population. The reason things merit a Wikipedia entry is because they are important to SOME people. As this article clearly is. I say it should stay.

unsigned comment by anon user User:129.67.43.240. — JIP | Talk 06:48, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, obvious vanity. Megan1967 01:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless every member of the mile-high club can get a page. Vegaswikian 07:09, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the current nonsense--nixie 14:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep How can this be vanity, re-read it! This needs adding to, not deleting. Possible title-editing to avoid confusion with other Peter Kennedys. Links to this page would be broken if this is deleted - surely for the sake of protecting the cross-linking, this must be kept! lilkimloving
- lilkimloving (talk · contribs)
- Comment: Some of the links-to appear inaccurate and possibly both irrelevent and damaging to Wiki --Simon Cursitor 07:53, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - irrelevant nobody and his "fan club" just proves that - Skysmith 07:27, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable, vanity. Quale 07:43, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Evidently not vanity (see keep comments) - should be kept and added to. Shpanda 14:41, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- User's first edit - Skysmith 07:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC) NOTE: User:129.67.43.240 removed this comment and has been messing with this page many times. He is likely to to do it again. Could someone check any connection? - Skysmith 09:20, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Not the figure skater. Not the musician. College prank attack article. Delete. Uncle G 23:28, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
Delete. Gosh. And I've met him. James F. (talk) 20:20, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:25, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Why was this even put on VfD? This is a text-book example of a speedy delete. Seriously, I know the guy. ed g2s • talk 22:51, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; what a waste of time. A2Kafir 16:27, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

coming from someone that has created entire wikipages dedicated to Asteroids and the Constitutions drawn up for future inhabitants of said asteroids...

Our anonymous friend is referring to the page "9491 Thooft," I believe. A2Kafir 18:47, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.