User talk:Mythrandia/Archive

Please don't submit .doc files here: please create and edit Wikipedia articles instead.

Myth, at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion you inserted comments as though another user, and inserted text to apparently alter another user's comments. This is not how Wikipedia operates. To find out how we do operate, go to Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers. Page histories reveal everything, so you really don't mess things up here when you do such bizarre things as the above. It just makes things a trifle annoying for the rest of us, but only briefly. I'm sure you can do more constructive things here. Jwrosenzweig 04:42, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Hi Mythrandia. Making personal attacks on other Wikipedians will get you nowhere. Why don't you raise the issue you have on their talk page? Thanks Dysprosia 15:42, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions of articles on linguistics. Regarding some of your other contributions, it might be worth your time to read Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Gazpacho 01:35, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Hansolm

Hi. I left a message for you on the talk page for the Dr. Hansolm article. Jez 01:56, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Thue | talk 20:23, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your contribution Whatever happens, Happens... does not make sense to the casual reader. If you don't what it to be deleted as nonsense you should go to it's talk page and explain why it is not nonsense. Thanks DJ Clayworth 20:48, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your other edits are desctructive of other people's contributions. If you continue to do this you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth 20:51, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles are being deleted because they make no sense. We are writing an encyclopedia here. And please don't give lectures on the works of Douglas Adams. DJ Clayworth 21:08, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make bad faith nominations of VFD you will be blocked from editing. DJ Clayworth 21:18, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I also notice that a lot of your edit summaries don't make any sense. They don't say anything about what the articles are about. Academic Challenger 00:11, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Let me tell you what you have done and why this is unacceptable. You have created articles which don't make sense - the individual words do, but there is no meaning or no coherent subject. You have then nominated these articles for deletion, implying that either you think the articles have no worth (in which case you were trying to cause trouble by creating them) or that you are nominating them for deletion when you don't reallywant them deleted. You are also putting obscenities in edit summaries for no good reason. You have also deleted other people's work and made insulting attacks on them.

You may consider this your last warning. If you do any of these again you will be simply blocked from editing. You can apologise or explain on this page if you have a reason. DJ Clayworth 01:25, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I believe in the Fundamental Interconnectedness of All things. As such, any claim that two of my expressions are unrelated is, of course, unintelligble, because it's impossible that I could be speaking about a topic that is not a coherent subject. My job, as an author, is to raise pertinent issues. Your response, as an oppressor, is to make categorical generalizations about them and threaten me, without providing any real insights into the actual substance. It is because of people like you that people like me get confined to mental hospitals, when we are, in fact Mostly Harmless. Mythrandia 01:25, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't come the Douglas Adams crap. Just stop doing this. It was funny for a while and now it's not. DJ Clayworth 01:34, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Phenyl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Phenyl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Affect logic

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Affect logic, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://affect-logic.com/5.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:52, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Affect logic

A tag has been placed on Affect logic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 01:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]