Talk:La Fenice
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Having ben disappointed at not being able to see inside the newly reopened Fenice during a visit to Venice next week I was hoping to read the impressions of anyone who has.
1996 Fire
[edit]I struck
- In 1996, the theater was closed for renovations when a fire broke out on 29 January.
(in the process of moving material from the 1st 'graph in order to restore chronology). It seems clear "completely destroyed" is closer to the truth than "closed for renovations", in light of nearly (6 weeks short of) 8 years' work.
--Jerzy(t) 05:58, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
-- At the time the theater caught fire, it was closed for renovations. ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.20.87.112 (talk) 23:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Did it come true that
- The first opera production will be La Traviata in November, 2004.
? In either case, the article needs an update of that sentence.
--Jerzy(t) 05:58, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Fenice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061010235604/http://www.teatrolafenice.it/static/storia_teatro_1837_I.php to http://www.teatrolafenice.it/static/storia_teatro_1837_I.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Fenice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029213810/http://www.us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/city_of_falling_angels.html to http://www.us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/city_of_falling_angels.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Copying verbatim
[edit]In my opinion, the recent additions by User:Pietro Tessarin fall foul of Wikipedia's guideline against plagiarism. The material added, twice, copies wholesale text from http://www.teatrolafenice.it/site/index.php?pag=73&lingua=eng which is unacceptable per Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, even if the text of that website were provided under a free licence – which it is not. I suggest to remove all material added after 9 March 2018. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:29, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Michael, when La Fenice was reopening in 2003 we put on our website a precise history of the Theater that is written in two books Bellina/Girardi and another fundamental book that is Brusatin/Pavanello. Gerda is help me and thank her for everything. I change all info in a wiki Italian page with the help of another great guy. But if you want remove i'm stopping because I'm at work and I wouldn't waste my time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pietro Tessarin (talk • contribs) 13:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Dear Michael and Dianna, finally the Marsilio permission for La Fenice Opera House wiki page https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QqwOu12zqDv3m1YLoyOsD3Wg9LAzIxJY/view?usp=sharing hope it will be ok for everything. best best, Pietro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pietro Tessarin (talk • contribs) 10:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- That declaration falls short in several ways. It allows mentioning of authors and works, not verbatim copying – there's never a need for permission to mention authors or sources, but for verbatim copying, the procedures at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials must be followed. The declaration disallows commercial use – Wikipedia licences allow it. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)