Talk:Saturn Girl

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Titan Girl

I corrected the error that Saturn Girl is from Saturn, in fact she is from Titan, Saturn's moon -Luornuviolet

Pics

This article needs pictures. Most of the other Legion characters have them, and she's one of the founders. Redxiv 04:55, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consistency

It would be nice if someone could settle on a name for the third Legion continuity and make it consistent throughout all the Legion related pages. I was just browsing through a bunch of character pages and I've seen it referred to as "Threeboot", "2005 Reboot", and "2005 Reimagining". Haven't seen this one yet, but "Post-Infinite Crisis" would probably work to describe the reboot. Or something else, whatever floats your boat :). Dmwc 20:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Age inspiration theory

The Golden Age inspiration for her (the "Saturnic girls" who invade Earth in Wonder Woman #10 and #22, one of whom forms Wonder Woman's villainous opponent league Villainy Incorporated) is put up front not because it's important or authoritative but because it's first in time - the 1940s. Putting that first in time also helps highlight the character's fictional status and separate talk about the creator's intent or inspiration from the in-universe commentary, which generally avoids that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Correctocratic (talk • contribs) 20:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem confusing and unhelpful to cut this section entirely, considering it both has scholasic authority among literary analysts of the character, and readers are refered here by several higher importance articles, such as Wonder Woman's creator and a score of articles more obviously related. Perhapse some fan knowledgeable concerning the character's history could write a section that actually cites said authority, to be placed in the article in it's own section, with brief mention in the preface (which wouldn't need citation, if it was provided in the appropate section, as per Wikipedia standards).

Wildly pruning article content of the information that people come to it seeking is counterproductive and counter indicated; so much more helpful to simply mark articles that need citation, as needing citation and to call for debates among those knowledgable concerning the subject if one questions the relevance of a section. Saturn Girl is probably both unquestionaably notable enough to warrant mention of popular scholarly theories concerning her inspiration and the most appropriate article to host discussions regarding inspiration and origin of the tropes she exemplifies.

71.235.31.212 (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary tagging

I just removed about 75 unecessary tags from the article. Some sentences had three tags in them. The article was impossible to read. Lets keep the tagging to a minimum. Unless there is reason to think that a fact may be disputed, there is no reason to tag it. Too many tags makes the article impossible to read. Thank you and be well --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]