Substub about a glamour model who doesn't even have an official website and has no verifiable biographical details on her agency's site. --Robert Merkel 00:53, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete as vanity, although I can't help but wonder what she looks like... - Lucky 6.9 01:24, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Google search can find you (not safe for work, but nothing hardcore) pictures if you're that keen...the short version is "attractive, but nothing exceptional". --Robert Merkel 03:59, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
LOL! I'll take your word for it. - Lucky 6.9 06:48, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I think this is an attempt at promoting the adult yahoo group in the external links. Delete unless turned into a real article. -- Cyrius|✎ 01:31, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I tried to chase down the links to this and another "glamour model" created at the same time, and they were to hobby/fanpages. Being photographed topless doesn't automatically mean significance. Geogre 02:03, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Silly silly nekkid people should go away. Kevin Rector 03:09, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete. [[User:Destinova|Marlowe²]] 03:39, Jun 22, 2004 (UTC)
Keep, though this is a stub. She's been an actual Page 3 model more than once - David Gerard 09:51, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
delink-ed the links so that if this is self-promotion they won't gain much google or alex. Can put them back if the article is kept. (no vote). DJ Clayworth 13:12, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Delete - if we gave every brainless idiot who got paid for whipping their bits out in the national press an entry we would need to spend their combined earnings on new drives.
