Talk:Race denial
Please enlighten me as to why a redirect is not appropriate.
First, regarding the disputed accuracy: avoid weasel terms. "Many competent scientists"—who? "Relevant fields"—which? Cite your sources.
Second, regarding POV: "race denial", as far as my Google searches can tell, is a term exclusively used in the pejorative, to imply that those who indeed hold that the concept of race is flawed are deluding themselves or others for the sake of political correctness. If such is the case, it should be mentioned, and race denial should not be presented as a neutral concept.
Most importantly, however—what does this article add to the matter that race does not, and why can't race be updated to reflect it? 82.92.119.11 00:00, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
A more suitable redirect is Validity_of_human_races which covers the same topic. I will aim it there - revert me if you think I am wrong. --Henrygb 00:44, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Race denial page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Race denial" page.
