Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compromise
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. ugen64 06:46, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
dicdef. Transwiki to wiktionary. Jonathan Christensen 09:11, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, important topic in negotiation, voting, and deletionism vs inclusionism, has potential for expansion. Kappa 11:47, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I think, then, that it is very fitting that I compromise by voting merge. To negotiation, seems most appropriate. Radiant_* 12:53, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep MarSch 17:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Would Kappa and/or MarSch please explain what encyclopediac potential this has? I've been wracking my brains, but can't think of anything I'd write in an encyclopedia article about "compromise." Jonathan Christensen 18:26, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Transfer to wiktionary. --Dr Ingel 01:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.