Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingo Giezendammer
Person in question appears to be mostly unnotable with a total of ~2 Google hits on someone else's personal page. Possibly vanity. -- Grunt 22:12, 2004 Jun 20 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. DJ Clayworth 17:00, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Definitely not notable. He's listed on the "List of Neo-Dadaists" that's also being considered for deletion. You know who else is on that list? The already-deleted Lennie Lee! Delete with extreme prejudice, thereby creating a new form of performance art. - Lucky 6.9 17:10, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Definitely notable. Google is not God. anthony (see warning)
- Delete - Google may not be god but Ingo is not notable. - Tεxτurε 01:18, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Have you even heard of Ingo before this? I can't think of a more notable graphic artist. anthony (see warning)
- I've never heard of Ingo Giezendammer. Are you sure you don't mean Ingo Giezendanner?
- Have you even heard of Ingo before this? I can't think of a more notable graphic artist. anthony (see warning)
- This guy is listed as a performance artist, not a graphic artist. I'm convinced it's part of a spamming effort on behalf of "Lennie Lee." - Lucky 6.9 16:23, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. --Gary D 08:42, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)