Talk:Wandsworth

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

question

So where if the "dodgy end" of wandsworth? should it be mentioned? 38.124.250.218 (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between borough and area

I think there are quite a few parts of this article that confuse the borough of Wandsworth with the small town of Wandsworth. For example, I recall the Evening Standard listed the whole borough (including the Battersea and Putney) when it listed it as third in the country for £1m+ property sales. I rather doubt there is that much £1m+ property in the area I would call Wandsworth, the Tonsleys may be expensive, but they are not that expensive. Of course, establishing this is made much harder because there are no citations. Can anyone add citations for some of these?Gaffertape (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For this reason I am deleting the reference to the new US embassy. This is planned for the Nine Elms area, which is in the Borough - but miles from the town of wandsworth.--Wickifrank (talk) 02:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weird emphasis

Was this article written by an estate agent? The breathless references to property values... the famous residents... the references to "excellent views across the Thames". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.61.208 (talk) 09:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name

There might be an argument for changing this to Wandsworth Town under common usage. [1] [2] MRSC (talk) 13:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merger of Sir James Barrie Primary School

The article doesn't have a section on schools, so this isn't really an option. $Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 14:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wandsworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030192829/http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm to http://www.gwp.enta.net/surrnames.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]