Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polarcomplementary

Polarcomplementary was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to speedy delete.

Seems like nonsense to me, but it is on the move to wiktionary list. A google search produces no results. A search on dict.org does not produce any results either. -[[User:Frazzydee|Frazzydee|✍]] 00:57, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Speedied. --fvw* 01:35, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)
• Absolutely should not have been sent to Wiktionary (if it was). The title was "polarcomplementary" and the content was "polarcomplementarity is." Geogre 05:14, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.